| Thursday, December 22, 2005 |
| moozik |
if you're a music freak like me, go here. it's like having your own ipod nano, minus the price.
|
posted by click & crash @ 12/22/2005 04:35:00 PM   |
|
|
|
| Friday, December 16, 2005 |
| happy family |
 +
 =
i was supposed to post the post (hehe) but i was in a hurry last friday kaya pics lang na-post ko. i came up with a theory after i chanced upon a picture and interview of jenny shimizu.
she recently came out (not coming out coming out) about her secret sexual relationship with angelina jolie. hooray!!! you can just imagine the joy i felt because i know you'd feel the same. anyway, she says they were in a relationship for 11 years. even before angelina married johnny lee miller, they were already an item. in the interview, jenny blabs about 1) kissing angelina (imagine the lips mga shungril); 2)angelina and knives; 3) angelina the wild child; 4)angelina as the un-"family" type of woman. she further states that angelina is not the type to settle down, with brad the-family-on-my-mind-man, no less. she says that angelina is the type who will not settle for one when she can have millions. may chance pa tayo!
so eto ang teorya ko... pero bago ang lahat, i have been thinking really hard about what ellen degeneres' character said to sharon stone in "if these walls could talk 2". it's something like "if by our love chenes chenes chenes..." forgot the line, pero it's the scene na slight nagtampo siya kay sharon stone habang binabato-bato ang hawak nyang bola.
going back to my theory: because they (angelina and jenny na ito ha) are not able to pool their wonderful, wonderful genes and produce a most magical child, choose ang lola angelina ng door # 2. drumrolls please... adopt! so angelina adopts a child who looks like jenny.
iyon nga lang, the kid will soon be the adopted son of brad pitt too.
i can dream, can't i? basta. for more, go here. |
| posted by click & crash @ 12/16/2005 03:47:00 PM |
|
|
|
| Thursday, December 01, 2005 |
| boo-boo |
i blew it this time. i swear, i did. hintayin ko ang memo bukas. pero here's how it happened.
my boss, the president of the company, is expecting foreign guests, and asked me to inquire about hotel rates. i called up discovery, manila hotel, richmonde, and holiday inn and asked about: holiday rates, discounts, promos, and other pertinent chenelyn.
when i got what i needed, i emailed him. tapos tinawag nya ako.
him: what does "good for 1 - 2 persons" mean?
me: it means that rooms can accomodate up to two persons.
him: and the $100 charge is per person, or per room?
me: per room sir.
him: so it's just $50 per person?
me: yes sir.
him: are you sure?
me: yes sir.
him: call them again and clarify. last month i stayed at manila hotel blah blah blah and they just charged me blah blah blah.
me: ok i will.
being the good assistant that i am (naks), i called again to clarify. and i was right all along. the charge is per room, not per head. i called the other hotels and got the same answer.
i put the phone down and before turning around, i grumbled "sabi nang per room eh. ang kulit kasi ni sir eh." i turned around, and surprise!!! si sir nasa likod ko lang pala, listening to the conversation. aguy! gudlak na lang sa akin. *singhot*
|
| posted by click & crash @ 12/01/2005 04:39:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
| click & crash |
|
|
| Latest Posts |
|
| Archives |
|
|
| Links |
|
|
|
